I agree with you, Indy. There are likely shareholders "here who could and would pick up some of those shares given specific changes in the matrix", particularly a change at the top where Glenn Estrella has produced the "failed status quo which always produces a quagmire in any context." Trunkmonk, for one, has hinted at times that he would buy more shares if there was a clear indication that things were changing for the better. He also has indicated that he will sell his shares at the end of the year if things don't change for the better.
You shouldn't include me in that group that would pick up shares. I'm done averaging down and beating my head against the wall. I honestly don't plan to ever buy another share of this company for as long as I live -- no matter what happens, good or bad.
I also think you may have missed be_real's point a bit. My take away from his post is that, while existing shareholders and even new shareholders may pick up shares, it's going to be difficult to move the share price with so many shares out there in the float. And let's not sugarcoat the obvious. A move to $0.01 could have been a move to $0.03, $0.05 or even $0.10 had there not been so much dilution on Estrella's watch.
So why aren't you buying more shares, Indy? Is that imaginary decent news you speak of not decent enough for you?
de·cent /'des(?)nt/
adjective
Definition: Of an acceptable standard; satisfactory. Adequate; fair; passable.
My definition: Nothing to get excited about; nothing to keep going on and on about.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
