Replies to post #23845 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[sunspotter]

"If you want to go through the CC transcripts, you'll find it there. I don't have the time today"

I've been through the transcripts. It isn't there as you claim.

Why would anyone claim it is when it isn't, I wonder?

[BeerIsGood]

I'd be happy to go through any transcripts or documents of any and all CC's VPLM had, however I can't find anywhere that VPLM has them. Could you point me to the links or location that VPLM has provided for everyone's review?

[nyt]

Red herring.. We all know that at some point vplm decided to declare that the game moving fwd, was sell. The point made, but avoided it seems, is that it was the fiduciary duty, imho, but not fulfilled, to fully inform the investors (after all, they needed investors, no?) of a change in the game plan. All those voip phone company things were on the table & on the Web & touted over & over, loudly, as "the leading edge in voip industry" (sells a few shares here & there, huh? Lol, what a concept..) & then, w/the merger, Chang said the patents would be incorporated into the our voip endeavors (lol) & also leveraged for licencing & infringement, to the tune of billions per annum....but then, to my knowledge (and I have looked & looked) outta the blue BAM! - - thankyou ma'am - - and immediately we were "transported" to the "new testament", and forget the old testament...and a new (sorta kinda) board (the ark of the covenant, lol). And getting answers to the questions beer raises about this is about as likely as finding the ark, lol