Replies to post #34165 on Cytogenix (fka CYGX)

[more please]

Gdepc, I'm hoping is was smart to buy it at over a $1.00 also.

[neo43]

gdepc, I said nothing about the share price, which I agree has done very well.

What I did say was, "all [the RBWs] have been guilty of highly-inflated expectations for what this company was going to accomplish and the time frames for doing so."

As an example, don't I recall you and/or Paulness predicting that a synDNA vaccine would be in the running to deal with bird flu? And didn't you and/or him disparage my contention that any such vaccine is at least 2 years off and probably a lot more? Well, did you notice in the PR about the Vical DNA-based flu vaccine (which is a LOT further along in development than anything based on synDNA) that it'll be at least 3 years before it might be available?

[Sanoman]

Gdepc:

What about the people who bought in at $3.00/share? They were excited about the new anti-sense technology. Since then, the share price has lost over half its value.

See, I can spin it just like you. The bottom line is that it has done nothing that you expected. You expected (Arnold, do you have the guesses in the contest?) a much much higher share price (Be Honest).

Don't give us that tired old, "those who bought at 40¢ in 2005... That is 4X your money. That is wrong, you did not sell and many others did not sell at the high. Even then it wasn't 4X. However, it is now only 3X. Next week it may be only 2X.

Your email was nothing but an emotional outburst to someone who dared to question this company. This board deserves better.

SM