Replies to post #34167 on Cytogenix (fka CYGX)

[gutaquest]

neo43, Could you claify what you mean.

You wrote:
"Well, did you notice in the PR about the Vical DNA-based flu vaccine (which is a LOT further along in development than anything based on synDNA) that it'll be at least 3 years before it might be available?"

Are you saying that Vical could not use synDNA manufacturing to support their DNA-based flu vaccine?

Gutaquest

[holycow]

neo, I believe I was the one who first made the argument that cygx would be in the running in this important race. Of course, I was just taking seriously statements made as part of press releases during the final months of last year. Your discussion with paulness about this is actually quite important, as I said at the time, and really deserves to be analyzed outside of the current competitive context.