InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

guardiangel

12/30/14 1:03 PM

#27155 RE: dcspka #27154

Yes...As long as it is not intentional and it is then approved by the USPTO...The attorneys resigned because they were not paid after March 1, 2013 when the corporation was void..The final rejection came in June 2014 after the corporation was void. How can a dead corporation file a RCE legally knowing it was a voided corporation..In my opinion that would be a criminal and federal act with a government agency..imo Wolf

There is no way it could be considered intentional because the corporation was void before the USPTO final rejection was decided..Most Intentional acts would be looked unfavorably if an action was done after a final rejection decision..imo Wolf


dcspka Tuesday, 12/30/14 12:53:37 PM
Re: guardiangel post# 27153
Post # of 27154
The legalese is starting to make my eyes glaze over.

In a nutshell, the next step is for Radient to re-instate itself as a corporation in Delaware. Then they can appeal the patent abandonment? Is this correct?
icon url

Gold Seeker

12/30/14 1:11 PM

#27158 RE: dcspka #27154

DC, you apparently do not understand how things work with the patent office. Radient cant appeal anything. It is the author of the patent who would petition to reinstate the application. That would be Howard and from what we know, she is now working for a MJ company and is probably no longer interested.