InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 2315
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/12/2013

Re: dcspka post# 27154

Tuesday, 12/30/2014 1:03:33 PM

Tuesday, December 30, 2014 1:03:33 PM

Post# of 30046
Yes...As long as it is not intentional and it is then approved by the USPTO...The attorneys resigned because they were not paid after March 1, 2013 when the corporation was void..The final rejection came in June 2014 after the corporation was void. How can a dead corporation file a RCE legally knowing it was a voided corporation..In my opinion that would be a criminal and federal act with a government agency..imo Wolf

There is no way it could be considered intentional because the corporation was void before the USPTO final rejection was decided..Most Intentional acts would be looked unfavorably if an action was done after a final rejection decision..imo Wolf


dcspka Tuesday, 12/30/14 12:53:37 PM
Re: guardiangel post# 27153
Post # of 27154
The legalese is starting to make my eyes glaze over.

In a nutshell, the next step is for Radient to re-instate itself as a corporation in Delaware. Then they can appeal the patent abandonment? Is this correct?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.