InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

LarryAshy

12/27/14 4:45 PM

#19243 RE: Netsurfer #19242

Some of that is correct. But when looking at the settlement agreement, in particular the assets deemed to belong to GT, those machines show that more than just growing boules was going on.

Researching what some of those machines do shows that there was wafering, cutting and polishing going on. As well as cell coating.

The Meyer Burger reference I made shows that more was going on here in the US that originally thought. Why would MB lay off so many in Colorado if most of the work was being done in China? What is the purpose for the wafering and polishing machines in Mesa if that was happening in China?

As far as I can tell, China wasn't doing any cell coating. Why have those machines in Mesa when all that was going on there was "growing boules"?

I can't provide the links at the moment, using my phone.

But, its funny you made mention of Mesa and China "working in parallel" and not "instead of"...kind of what I was getting at all along;-)
icon url

LarryAshy

12/27/14 5:02 PM

#19246 RE: Netsurfer #19242

Oh...BTW...I like the sound of "laminated window patent";-)
icon url

LarryAshy

12/27/14 9:34 PM

#19263 RE: Netsurfer #19242

I forgot to add this one to the list:

http://www.meyerburger.com/en/media/ad-hoc-commercial-news/current/?newsevents[detail]=1864&cHash=ac67b7d0909915ed46c3a1e09e693e18

This is directly from MB. It clearly shows that they were still doing the bricking, right in Colorado, not in China as many had assumed.

It clearly states that it increased capacity and production specifically for the Apple/GT collaboration.

Sounds like the beginnings of an American production to me.

Why the cutting, bricking and polishing equipment at Mesa, and a separate facility and operation in Colorado too?