InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

whitemanfromtown

05/02/06 10:23 PM

#11208 RE: whitemanfromtown #11207

I don't see anything xenophobic about Hogan and Hartsons former partner, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Roberts:

After graduating from law school, Roberts served as a law clerk for Judge Henry Friendly on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals for one year. From 1980 to 1981, he served as a law clerk to then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist on the United States Supreme Court. From 1981 to 1982, he served in the Reagan administration as a Special Assistant to U.S. Attorney General William French Smith. From 1982 to 1986, Roberts served as Associate Counsel to the President under White House Counsel Fred Fielding .

Roberts entered private law practice in 1990 as an associate at the Washington, D.C.-based law firm of Hogan & Hartson, but left to serve in the first Bush administration as Principal Deputy Solicitor General from 1989 to 1993. During this time, Roberts argued 39 cases for the government before the Supreme Court, prevailing in 25 of them. He represented 18 states in United States v. Microsoft.

In 1992, George H.W. Bush nominated Roberts to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, but no Senate vote was held, and Roberts's nomination expired when Bush left office after losing the 1992 presidential election. Roberts returned to Hogan & Hartson as a partner, and became the head of the firm's appellate practice, in addition to serving as an adjunct faculty member at the Georgetown University Law Center. In his capacity as head of Hogan & Hartson's appellate practice, Roberts argued several cases before the Supreme Court:


icon url

d4diddy

05/03/06 2:31 PM

#11232 RE: whitemanfromtown #11207

"...So who are these anonymous "experts" that appear on these boards do their drive bys then disappear?"

Kidinsight, capnmike, ontheedge, osscout, tomscheboy, dadoc, stockdoc.... etc (yawn).

I'd say it's about time for Capnmike to "reapppear" and hype some irrelevant links and cap-off (no pun intended) his post with one of the following expressions:

1. WOW!

2. ... and that's why I am even more confident than ever with my investment in CDEx

icon url

d4diddy

05/03/06 2:33 PM

#11233 RE: whitemanfromtown #11207

edit/delete
icon url

d4diddy

05/04/06 2:01 PM

#11257 RE: whitemanfromtown #11207

Excuse me WMFT, I left out the verb- "I'm happy". Now what excuse do you have for this obscenity:

"There wouldn't be ANY lawsuit if what we have isn't very valuable and threatening to other companyes."

Bad spelling and a triple negative ta boot! LOL!!

"There is a law suit because what we have is very valuable and threatening to other companies."

Did you drop out of high school?

I ain't got no none time to be schooling you no more on my company's time.

~out