Also wonder in the back of my head if WALRAT KNEW something was fishy here , and there MAY have been other assets held OUTSIDE her jurisdiction,so allowed the EC and the lti's to move forward.
Can't remeber exactly what her words were but , didn't she make reference to this being worth 10 bill(FOR WHAT) and wasnt rosey and group looking at 25$ a share for newco shares(FOR WHAT) at one point in time.
I said before as it was going down , a BK JUDGE can only rule with what is presented IN A BK CASE , IN BK COURT , nothing more.
No IT or how we got here or who may have forced us here (SHORTING) or wire taps , civil charges or anything else that did not PLAY/INVOLVE THE BK ESTATE ONLY.
You heard her say that " THE IT(insider trading) WAS COLOR-ABLE RIGHT!!!!!!!!!! Yet she did nothing RIGHT.
It was not her JOB not her RIGHT not her jurisdiction to address anything but what was presented to her withing the confines of the BK CASE ITSELF , KNOW assets KNOWN liabilities
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
