Replies to post #15855 on GT Advanced Technologies Inc fka GTAT

[TheBunny]

Apple was well aware of the power supply problem. I'm sure there will be questions related to that in todays deposition. Bottom line is this:

If a partner in a contract, though his actions, or willing inaction's, causes deliberate damage to the agreement, and makes injuries that prohibit the partnership to be viable, the contract becomes unenforceable, and the offending partner is liable for all damages, and the contract is Null and Void.

If Judge Borodoff, agrees with the fact that Apple knowing prevented the back-up power supply to the Mesa Facility, GOOOO- Byeeee Apple. GUILTY ! Pay all costs, and the furnaces ownership is 100% GTAT's. Next Case !


-Bunny-

They should ask them that why did they decide not to provide backup power source and not to have a stable power supply. what was the reason behind it and did they try to understand the impact of this in the day to day operations and performance of the furnaces. These questions will explain a lot about their plans and motives. If they said no or gave vague answers or start making up reasons, like some other company was doing this and that then it will explain that they were not looking for the success of this project and goal was something else.