Replies to post #104455 on NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[Rawnoc]

If a year ago I would have said NNVC would only produce 8% of what it needs for the TOX studies a year later, I would have been laughed off the board.

Hell, I wouldn't have been able to type that with a straight face.

The results were far, far worse than the bear-est of bears even expected. When this is celebrated as progress I can't help but laugh.

[rosie77]

for about the 5th time, they spent that year scaling the process so that now they are able to do batches of 200g.

They knew a year ago that they needed to make a lot of Flucide for tox, and that making Flucide is the single most important thing they had to do, as tox can't be done without it, and clinical trials can't be done without tox. So if they weren't working flat out for a year to make as much Flucide for tox as possible, they were grossly incompetent.

[Snowy_Owl]

You are of the position that anything said by NNVC management isn't worth a grain of salt. Yet you hang onto the 2.5 Kg number as if it were gospel and all material had to be delivered at the same time.

You may recall the unforeseen circumstances that delayed the pilot plant coming on-line. Weather, floor issue, and back ordered equipment put NNVC in a serious bind for producing the Flucide needed to start the tox study as planned.

So they did what certified PMPs are trained to do by implementing the contingency plan. They used the old lab to produce enough material to get the project started as planned and are steadily ramping up the pilot plant to active production.

What some would commend as good project management you see as gross incompetence.

So if they weren't working flat out for a year to make as much Flucide for tox as possible, they were grossly incompetent.