Their own track record shows that much said by NNVC management isn't worth a grain of salt. If we could always count on what NNVC management says Flucide would have FDA approval by now. For that matter, so would Rabiescide and HIVcide.
The unreliability of NNVC's statements are always in one direction -- they are over optimistic. So, yes, when the 10-Q says that at least 2500 g of Flucide are needed for tox, it's reasonable to assume that at least 2500 g of Flucide are needed for tox.
Remember that making Flucide in the old lab wasn't originally the "contingency plan" -- we were told for a long time that the new facility wasn't needed for tox, and that all the Flucide for tox would, in fact, be produced in the original lab.
Your post really just says in so many words that for this and that reason, 200g was in fact the maximum amount of Flucide that NNVC was able to produce. Which is what I've been saying all along.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
