InvestorsHub Logo

elysse1kittycat

11/22/14 9:09 AM

#76710 RE: farviewhill #76704

In addition to all of the nefarious forces you so rightfully cite which are holding back the stock price, it must also be remembered that good news or positive articles by SA released at various intervals isn't going to result in a sustained stock price.
In short, even though to some of us it appears that everything is in place for the company to succeed over time and that it just a matter of time before the stock price catches up(this would include uplisting as well as the progress and tests related to the technology), for many present and potential investors, it is far from a case of "Cruise Control" and simply waiting and biding their time.
For them the time is NOW and/or in the FORESEEABLE future, and that clearly is not the case right now meaning, which in essence means selling and/or not buying and deploying their funds elsewhere.
Imo in theory anyways, the company needs more sustained and positive news to keep these folks interested-short term manipulated bounces based on rehashed news and repeated and rewritten
positive opinions based on this isn't going to get it done and in essence will simply give the mm's and naked shorters another opportunity to drive the stock price down.

art2426

11/24/14 9:56 AM

#76743 RE: farviewhill #76704

I think you've answered your own question very accurately, in regarding the lack of price improvement despite promising reports.

While sitting in this crappy OTC exchange, we are sitting ducks for all or any who want to play games with this stock. A company with no revenue, no product on the market and a past questionable CEO with a history of self serving actions while in power, was and is, easily a target by the powers that can control. IMO until a reputable brokerage firm backs this company AFTER WE MOVE TO A HIGHER EXCHANGE, we will trade among individual investors lacking the firepower to overcome these MMs. They thrive on the OTC, pinks etc. IMO, RABIN and his self serving actions destroyed the credibility of this company and its trials. A giant RED FLAG was waving to big money and conservative investors. Those two go hand in hand, thus avoiding an investment such as this, even though a positive outcome to trials would most definitely be reflected substantially in the stock price. Big house investment firms are historically very conservative as they advise and have to answer to serious and financially successful clients. They WILL advise ACTC purchases to them if and when they are SURE of its success. This is why all are waiting as to such recommendations. AND if such occurs (buy ercommendation) prior to reported results one must wonder about inside information.
OH BUT isn't that illegal? That never happens in Wall Street!!
RIGHT!!!!

In the meantime one must ask, is this a good opportunity to accumulate shares and take advantage of the repressed price?