IMO.. that 56% ownership on the down-low is complete BS. I don't get how anyone can believe that drivel. And how did they arrive at that 56%? Was it from the Annual Shareholders meeting? I have shown that many other companies with the same type of voting. Are all of those companies somehow, being purchased behind the scenes?
I dont think I ever said A SINGLE BP owns 56% illegally.
BUT a group of people, maybe even in excess of 20, have had information shared between them that it would be a "good idea" if they each bought 3 or 4 million shares of PPHM.
I don't even see anything illegal about it unless you could dig up some paperwork that doesn't exist.
Actually I believe it would be very stupid if "they" didn't do it.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
