InvestorsHub Logo

barge

11/10/14 8:44 PM

#239700 RE: tkc #239699

11/04/14 "TPM as Virtual Smart Card - A No-Brainer?"

Nice aggressive marketing. Wave of course is highlighted Go Solms!

http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/community/2014/11/tpm_as_virtual_smart_card__a_nobrainer

TPM as Virtual Smart Card - A No-Brainer?

by TCG in Action
Share
At the Trusted Cyber Collaboration Workshop, experts from Infineon, Wave Systems, HP, Wave Systems and Asguard Networks addressed a number of trending security issues and the role of trust in helping solve them.

John Fitzgerald of Wave Systems addressed a commonly asked question for TCG: how to use the TPM. In this case, the TPM acts as a virtual smart card. Why use the TPM for this application?

Fitzgerald notes that passwords are easy to break and complex to manage, as well as expensive. Poor passwords are a leading factor for breaches. Multi-factor authentication is stronger, but there are many choices and expensive and complex to manage as well. In fact, costs can be up to $150 per user, according to Gartner.

The TPM is included in enterprise PCs and can be turned into an inexpensive and more easily managed smart card. It’s tied to the platform and can’t be lost. Its hardware root of trust offers strong authentication and allows only known users and known devices to access enterprise systems and data. TPMs in systems with Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 can be used as virtual smart cards.

Learn more about using TPMs as smart cards here and more about TPMs in general here, https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/?e=category.solutionDetail&urlpath=authentication&resource_cate

mymoneybgone

11/10/14 9:53 PM

#239701 RE: tkc #239699

Not only that TKC, I will go one further. For years we were told they were in the cat bird's seat in this space via their standing in the TCG. With the company's they had piloted with and the OEM that were including product. Not only WERE they in the perfect position to get a read on their own failings to convert in this space, but everybody else's as well. Especially when I have read for years how they were going to be able to piggy back and make money off product that wasn't solely wave in name.

The merit of sks is nothing but hot air if the company never becomes self reliant on it's product and not by selling shares. The straw man argument is to place the blame anywhere but in the lap of the one who was running the ship. The vision he harbored may have been grand in scope, but was tunnel in reality.

The facts bear this out. He was incapable at managing the financial side of the business, and that was laid bare when he was fired. His vision which had much support dwindled to the point where he could not even muster enough inside the company.

The people that were responsible know far more about this than anyone here on the boards. These were the same folks that I could make a very strong case on what their compensation has been for years, cared a hell of a lot more about pulling in a check than shareholder value. Do a little research on what some BOD members pull in and compare that to what wave's BOD compensation is...shocking.


Plain and simple his utter lack of fiscal prudence that initially damaged the shareholders began to threaten this company. The pet projects that sucked cash reserves for years were a drain on the core mission of the company. The argument that these would enhance the product portfolio is bogus when the core product is not even in the hands of the end user.


At the end of the day the, sprague, the shareholders, and ultimately the company have been victims of this "vision".

I find myself choking on the word vicitm and sprague in the same sentence. Profiting from the largesse of the shareholders seem more apropos in dollars and kudos.

Now if only somebody can figure out how to make the TPM useful in the same way the neglected cigarette lighter in the vehicle became the indispensible usb port.......

aleajactaest

11/11/14 7:40 AM

#239705 RE: tkc #239699

hi tkc,

i think you are exactly right. you can't claim both of these two choices:

1. ss was honest about wave's pipeline being full.
2. wave's pipeline had nothing in it due to the os vendors.

they are mutually exclusive.

barge claims 2 is true, so in my view the corollary of that choice is that the ceo was a rogue.

if anyone wants to justify the ceo being a rogue be my guest. weby was one who did. and i shall tell them what happens to investors when the ceo is a rogue and they think that is okay.

hopefully some have learnt the value of integrity. jaundiced cynicism does no one any good.