Continuing the thought from the forum ,
",,,why wouldn't you have a 1-350 R/S and save the company 10 million dollars?" josh
~ I guess you missed the part;
"The shareprice SHOULD rocket to its prior range+ of .02+++ !
At that point , sell 1 billion shares into the fray @ .02+++ and collect $20-50 million to continue ops ."
~ That would translate to a 100% to 500% profit on the investment .
You see , the pps not only affects shareholders but , the company .
That is why Frank is such a turdball for hugely diluting the float , when if he would have only backed up his claims and held the float to 9bil he could have sold ONE billion shares (as I propose) @.02 = $20+++mil , instead of 100bil shs for $10mil and killing the company .
I have to believe he significantly raised the O/S originally to fight of Fan & co , and as reality came crashing down , he decided to cut and run .
Next chapter for Frank is Argentina or jail .
Anyway , a R/S IS a choice . The difference is IMO;
~ R/S's virtually NEVER work ,
~ Fan won't generate ANY capital from a R/S ,
~ EVERYONE will take a hit on their original investment ,
~ There will be NO goodwill from the move , thereby looking fragmented and broken .
~ The bashers will have succeeded in there cause , and would continue their havoc .
~ The market will look at a R/S as a last ditch effort ,,,, sentiment ZERO .
~ Quite honestly , a R/S will concede to no valuation .
Do you honestly think a R/S would be better than a massive BB ?
~ BB; Solid company statement ! Result , upside on every level .
~ R/S; Pathetic , obvious , dubious , stretch , with marginal expected results .
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
