Having slept on this the more I think about it the more bothered I am by this conversation... Point by point.
1) Of course they will say this. They have to say no reverse split. They are not legaly bound by this statement and to say one is coming would just crush the stock. I am not saying a RS is coming but what else are they going to say?
2) I don't have any problems with what they said about the Video, accept I think Nov 7 may be a little early for the editing to get done. Its in a do-able time frame but the early part of it. The Video In My opinion is what matters. Everything else is fluff. Can the product do what they say it can? If so were golden if not were toast.
3)about damn time and I don't care about Money TV.
a) Agreed.
b) why do they care about shorters? If the company can do what they claim and prove it the shorters will dissappear. If they can't they wont. Their energy would be better served dealing with EEG devices and marketing than giving a rats patoot about Shorters. They should be more worried about clients and customers than "enemies" This whole Tone of phrasing bothers me. It shows the shorters are in their heads and they shouldn't be. Just Do your job and they will go away.
4) why is the company giving a rats ass about Retraces unless they plan on flipping their own stock? also they just told everyone that they are going to dump their shares at 3 cents and pretty much everyone else should do the same. Good luck breaking past $0.03 on any future runs. Again, why do they care about this unless their plan is to sell? Why did it even enter the conversation unless they have been thinking about this? Even more concerning why are they telling a share holder this? this part of the conversation stinks pretty badly. Why is the company worrying about their bottoms and tops so much when they should be focused on ramping up production and product launch? They should be too damn Busy to be thinking about any of this.
5) If they can do what they claim then yeah everyone is interested. That they are out of hand rejecting buy outs is also damn convenient if one plays devils advocate and assumes no one is buying them out or interested. It all begins and ends with can they do what they claim? So far no one anywhere has any proof. Licensing their patent is good, but if the price is right so is a Buy out. All of this is immaterial however if they can't walk the walk.
The only thing about this post is the demo. Too much of it was on price fluctuation and share price.
Why no discussion about productions plans, product retail cost, or possible application? Too much of this conversation sounded like day traders talking about flipping shares. Day TRaders don't build anything. This company is only worth a damn if they have a product they build and sell.
The More I think about this conversation the more bothered I am by it.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
