InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

oldretiredguy

10/26/14 8:59 PM

#61019 RE: Barney Vissur #61013

The discussion of VPC only having Husky machines is interesting. Please correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Tom Steipp once say that VPC had an Engel machine? Which begs the question- what happened to it?
icon url

truetrue

10/26/14 9:46 PM

#61021 RE: Barney Vissur #61013

OOO - I'm only trying to follow the bread crumbs you guys are dropping and add some "suppositions" and color.

I'm pickin' up what you're layin' down !

Hey, I want more reasons to buy LQMT and be a more long term HOLDER and not a partial trader. The patent and assignees "dark" turned up is VERY interesting.

What are your thoughts on a APPLE / MTRN & Magna /Swales former employees Beals (Daimler) and Ryczek (Swales now MTRN) employees synergy ?

http://assignments.uspto.gov/assignments/q?db=pat&asnrd=RYCZEK,%20LAWRENCE%20H.

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/lawrence-ryczek/25/9a4/838

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=107556442

Swales Aerospace is just around the corner from the Goddard Space Flight Center and NASA's Langley, Virginia facility.

"In 2002, Swales took over the lead contractor position in a $225 million, five-year contract to provide NASA Langley with Systems Analysis and Mission Support (SAMS), displacing previous agreements held by giant Lockheed Martin and Federal Data Corp."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swales_Aerospace
icon url

ZombieSecurityAgent

10/27/14 8:57 AM

#61030 RE: Barney Vissur #61013

I pretty much figure Visser is glad to put this dog behind him. Pretty sure being involved with LQMT is a blemish on his otherwise remarkable accomplishments in life.

LQMT is a dog because it's a dog. Not because Visser, a very accomplished investor who like many others who have come and gone, or are still here, believed in the technology and got involved. So why not go ahead and blab and slander the believers who bought this junk at $15 and $20 while we're at it?

Seriously. 1 Engel machine, maybe revenues sometime next year, maybe it will be worth the 80 million market cap in 5 years assuming this technology is viable competition in the material world.

I'm sure LQMT loves the support on the board though. Maybe because it helps them to continue to grow that exponential dilution as well as, comfort the old timey investors who are still here. My god man, from under 50 million in 2010 to over 460 million in under 5 years. That is what this junk does best, DILUTE. And they have 1 machine and potentially some paying clients next year to show for it. Oh yeah and the Swatch revenues which fall well short of paying the bills. Hence dilute.

If someone could please point me to a reason to believe in LQMT I will gladly put this junk in a personal IRA and get friends and family involved as well. And scream from the roof top just how great it is to be an LQMT junk holder. Thanks.

Just my opinion and best of luck.