Agree with 'revolution' - but why not do another test?
I would have thought that precisely because this technology could be so significant - let's say it did what Tao said, last 11 hours and double flow, well that is ridiculous - they would do another test, and more tests in different conditions. Just one location would not seem like enough to then go for a big installation would it?
I really have no clue. For the TransCanada people, they are asset managers. they look at numbers. If that machine, however it works, makes the numbers go up by X amount, reliably, then they are going to use it. But I would just have thought that there would be mental obstacles around something so significant. However, maybe it's just a 5 or 10% flow increase, in which case it could be easier.