I didnt say people look at Global, I said it wasnt an F100 company and it certainly isnt so as I said before the point was made and now crow has been served up. As the number I posted wasnt a made up it was the first number that popped up when I ran a check on it's actual ranking. I didnt notice it was a global ranking and it didnt really matter as to the discussion, it is not an F100 company so the point is quite moot.
As to being bad, never said Fluor is bad or inferred it was bad as a customer. My point has been straight forward all along, Rich exaggerates, he omits things, he lies and that is in fact true.
Saying Fluor is an F100 is an exaggeration of the FACTS, it isnt and that is a verified FACT.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
