Ready,
Did you buy on the science or did you buy to make a quick trade? I ask because this makes a difference. If the stock drops to a $1 before efficacy new, how will you feel? I, myself, won't be happy, my investment will be a fraction of what I paid. But at this point in time I'm convinced I'd buy more. Why, because of the science. The company raised enough money to get us through the next wave of results. The fact that the stock is being taken down by hedge funds doesn't make it a bad investment, it just makes it a risky one. Risky for longs if the science fails. And risky for hedge funds who don't cover before good news. If you believe hedge funds are seeing blind data and that's why they're short, perhaps you should get out. Or you could wait around like other on-the-fence longs, who waiting for the company to reveal something. Imagine it's not all rosy, and they release death news on Direct patients (death is inevitable for most of these poor souls), what do you think AF will do with that? He'll harp on the bad, and brush aside the good. Be prepared because it will happen. The true longs will understand its a manipulative act, and slowly, the HFs will see it too. The point of me telling you all this is because until we get efficacy news that is going to lead to sustained revenue, longs are in for a bumpy stock - and its anyone's guess on where it will go - and if you're breaking at the seams at $4 imagine where you'll be at $1. Don't risk what you cant walk away from.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
