Snackman: You seem to conflate and confuse opinion with facts, i.e., "June is ours!" Another June like these last few would kill us off.
Why don't we both just wait for a little bit to see if my cynicism or your optimism comes closest to what actually happens.
I know you are more than anxious to throw out the entire assemblage of the years under Steven. Somehow you seemed not to take into account either the paltry performance or the lofty promises of profitability he was always making.
If I had been that misled for that long, I might be anxious to chuck it into the waste can, too. But I am talking about going forward in terms of Wave.
I just want to wait for results, while you are hailing the mere promise of govt deals as virtually assured. No, not your words, but my summary of what your meaning is--and an accurate one, I think, based on thousands of posts you authored.
It was pretty rare when you criticized Steven, even when he was so far down the wrong tracks it was clear to many of us. You limited discussion of Wave to the positive, when it was rarely positive.
Now we get a sprinkling of a positive event that does hold real potential. My argument is, let's wait to see if we can truly celebrate this as a real deal for Wave. Is that so wrong? Especially given what we have recently been through with Wave?
Solms is an unknown quantity to this point. I just want to hold off placing a halo around his head until he does something worthy of a halo. IMO, this first modest sale to the govt is a great start, but hardly the turnaround many of us had been led by Solms to believe would begin before now.
What's another quarter or two?
Blue
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
