InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

f3tt3f

10/02/14 8:20 PM

#20277 RE: DownWithPumpers #20275

F-stain couldn't have said it better himself.

Or perhaps he just did...
icon url

flipper44

10/02/14 8:48 PM

#20281 RE: DownWithPumpers #20275

Hi! Noticed Cramer anticipated Abbott and Merck aren't going to fare so well in the future....strong dollar and all. That strong dollar sure is Finicky. Just two big drug companies? Hmmmm.
icon url

TZOR

10/02/14 8:51 PM

#20282 RE: DownWithPumpers #20275

Who ever wrote this is factually wrong in that adam does own stock, he owns stock in thestreet, it says so on every article he writes. It's a disclaimer. What isn't written is WHAT ARE THE HOLDINGS OF THESTREET.COM, as there could be significant conflicts of interest.
icon url

Evaluate

10/02/14 11:21 PM

#20302 RE: DownWithPumpers #20275

You say DownWithPumpers ... I say DownWithShorters.
Well, I do not have a gripe with all shorters, just the shorters who apply illegal tactics and methods, and those shorters who might fall right below that threshold but who are able to put such undue pressure on (small biotech) companies that it hurts the company, the companies' ability to pursue financing and hurts the shareholders and last but not least hurts patients with serious & fatal diseases. Especially when such shorters apply sneaky tactics, and when it appears that they might have an alternate agenda. And I do not like Naked Shorters.
icon url

hodge14

10/03/14 8:46 AM

#20319 RE: DownWithPumpers #20275

You wrote on your blog interestingly enough:

In my opinion, his coverage is professional and fair, as he often discusses both the “bull” and “bear” arguments for a given stock.



Please point me to the parts where he discusses the potential "bull" argument as you put it. For a second there I thought you were commenting on Larry Smith's coverage.