InvestorsHub Logo

big gains1988

09/26/14 1:12 PM

#121 RE: xZx #119

But only one further refute.
I don't need to provide you with any proof, and I'm not saying that they weren't involved, because they very well probably were, but you're looking for a conviction, in which case you would need proof. Actual proof, not circumstantial, which you wouldn't even have access to.