InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dbrown13

09/20/14 12:34 PM

#15973 RE: 2bStealthy #15972

While not scientific american, this is just as relevant.
icon url

$hrimp2Whale$

09/20/14 1:43 PM

#15974 RE: 2bStealthy #15972

They ask a 'question' and fail to deliver any reasonable answer - in fact, leaving only more questions than they started with. I did more 'scientific' studies in middle school.

I guess what some consider 'scientific' looks strikingly similar to propaganda from 1936.. LOL

icon url

$hrimp2Whale$

09/20/14 6:05 PM

#15975 RE: 2bStealthy #15972

Excerpt via link you provided : comment section :

"The "marijuana/schizophrenia" connection turned out to be an incorrect conclusion from the initial observation that several schizophrenic patients consumed marijuana. Prohibitionists jumped on the idea that showed marijuana caused schizophrenia, and the media belched it out.

It turns out, some schizophrenic patients were actually self-medicating with cannabis. Further research has shown most schizophrenics obtain effective relief, while a few get aggravation of their symptoms.

But prohibitionists love this false causation idea so much they continue to cling to it, as this person does.

This is another disturbing piece of anti-marijuana propaganda that displays such a highly politicized distortion of science at Scientific American that it smells tremendously of corruption. That's incredibly sad." Username: jontomas