I'm not sure observing what is (trolling) is advance pooh-poohing. If calling it what it is seems like pooh-poohing it may be a function of the lenses worn. It is trolling, if something comes from it then something does, but the existence of a lawsuit in the past does not make the current state of affairs anything more or less than what it is. I am uncertain what the alternative is to observing what is. Is one to start imagining the shape and nature of allegations, postulate on who or what the defendants might be and so on in order not be careless?
What constitutes a careful not-brushed-aside consideration of trolling?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
