InvestorsHub Logo

stockless

09/18/14 11:19 AM

#19781 RE: Chase14 #19780

All's I can do is laugh at that. It looks to me that this bonehead committee was more concerned with his gross arrogance [LOL] than the crime itself. This guy is grossly arrogant he needs to be dealt with harshly. lol again. They said it was a single error in judgment. He was probably thinking why m I hear. Granted he may have learned the hard way but as I have learned from what I call stupid traffic violations I didn't take them seriously but the system did. I'm sure his lesson is learned.

driven3

09/18/14 12:01 PM

#19784 RE: Chase14 #19780

Conclusion from the link: (Page 19) The penalty orders of the committee:

From a date which is 14 days after this decision (which will allow an opportunity for VCNZ to appoint the supervisor) DR. Casey is to practice
subject to a condition that his practice be supervised



Read the rest on page 19 on this link


http://www.vetcouncil.org.nz/documentation/Judicial/JudicialCommitteePenaltyDecision_JC28.pdf