InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Maria56

09/15/14 10:45 AM

#37337 RE: Indica #37336

And the Mendocino code says that there has to be 50 feet between the fence around the 25 plants and the boundary of the parcel. Sooooo, this isn't legal, no matter how you wanna define parcel:

Sec. 9.31.050 Limitation on Location to Cultivate Marijuana

(A)

The cultivation of marijuana, whether grown collectively or individually, in any amount or quantity, shall not be allowed in the following areas:
...
(5)

Outdoors within fifty (50) feet of a parcel under separate ownership.
...
All marijuana grown outdoors must be within a secure fence at least six (6) feet in height that fully encloses the immediate garden area. The fence must include a lockable gate that is locked at all times when a qualified patient or caregiver is not in the immediate area. Said fence shall not violate any other ordinance, code section or provision of law regarding height and location restrictions and shall not be constructed or covered with plastic or cloth except shade cloth may be used on the inside of the fence.


https://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientId=16484
icon url

Maria56

09/15/14 10:47 AM

#37338 RE: Indica #37336

Not to mention, that I asked an officer who said he had seen the video if the grow was legal and he said no.
icon url

wingnut2tight

09/15/14 11:10 AM

#37339 RE: Indica #37336

LOL - are you saying the 100 or so plants called "A forest of og kush" are in 4 different parcels? That's just stupid - for one thing, parcels must be surrounded by a fence and separated by 50 feet.

icon url

wingnut2tight

09/15/14 12:16 PM

#37346 RE: Indica #37336

Amato says "we don't need no stinkin' parcels". He's made up his own "laws and laws within laws", and has an "agricultural medical exemption", which only exists in his fantasy imagination.

These people are incredibly incompetent. Makmann may have really screwed up this time, getting involved in an illegal operation.

This could get interesting.