It seems as though the cheerleaders cannot face the truth you and I have presented. The company tried to use a dirty trick by in industry standards, of telling certain individuals what they wanted posted. It releases them, Supreme, from any legal responsibility of misrepresentation to investors all while pick-pocketing naive potential buyers. It's as though they're posting what they want readers to believe is their own DD, but in essence it the company feeding them the hogwash.
It's used regularly in penny stocks and SEC will never enforce. Even Canada's version of SEC warned everyone of investing in MJ companies that suddenly appear because they're claiming to be in line for licenses. The number of tickers fo MJ business shot up so fast and many bought into the hype. Supreme was one of them that failed to deliver and now has been exposed.
It really seemed "silly" when one poster would run to Supreme's defense every time someone asked the hard questions about David Stadnyk. Now they've all disappeared because the evidense stands for itself, NO ONE IS BUYING!
AVOID ticker SPRWF at least until mid 2015 when the case of Canada vs growers is heard and ruled on!
Your welcome!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
