InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BioChica

08/31/14 9:58 AM

#33257 RE: HDGabor #33251

Exactly! What point would there be to modify SPA(Contract for Study design) after the fact. A label change would be appropriate!
icon url

sts66

08/31/14 1:57 PM

#33266 RE: HDGabor #33251

I agree no change to SPA makes sense, the only thing relevant is "you can file sNDA for ANCHOR after 50% enrollment of R-IT" - what the FDA likely wanted to change was language for ANCHOR label, which AMRN may have refused. If FDA said "no ANCHOR until interim R-IT results", of course AMRN would have refused, as they needed the cash to get there.