Robi: If your link is true, then Seymour lied again. He siad Tox material was coming from existing lab...said it multiple times. And remember who said this: The next excuse will be "becasue the new facility is so efficient, we've decided to make the Tox material there."
Keep questioning my sources and they still have a 100% accuracy record (except for the lie from managment that the Tox would start July 15.
Rawnoc Member Level Sunday, August 17, 2014 1:06:27 PM Re: nanopatent post# 96884 Post # of 97877
Looky Looky at what I predicted on July 24 -- Almost exactly what Seymour claimed in his recent post:
IF it is true that the Flucide Clinical Trials are delayed by a year, from 2015 to 2016, that represents a minimum burning US $2 million a quarter doing, what again? Drowning mice/rats in FluCide?
If Dr. Seymour says we are not delayed, are you suggesting we adopt an outsider's timelines, over what the CEO states? Not to mention an individual who engages in "character assassination" of Dr. Anil Diwan, the mind that made this journey possible, calling him a "control freak".
The FDA remained quiet while our government gave a lawless pass to toxic Cannabis...go forward to market with a simple democratic vote? Sweet, is it? Overnight, the lawless drug cartels stop being psychopaths-r-dem to become productive citizens of this nation! All thanks to a new democratic law. So, how does it work? Toxic Cannabis can do its clinical trials after it goes to market to rack up millions from the impoverished! I think we could also use a sweet deal like that with the difference we are low toxicity, effective, and we will be saving millions of lives.
All of this always takes me back to the time when we discovered that the FDA had imposed the requirement to find the toxic dose (MFD) for full tox study. They imposed this MFD requirement on low toxicity FluCide and our small biotech. Low toxicity FluCide has an excellent safety profile and has been successful with 6000 animal subjects, we cannot fail on our own, but the FDA is helping?
No interviews. It is taxpayers money they are throwing at companies but John Q. Taxpayer does not need to know how they determine what company gets taxpayers money and what company does not (that also means us).
The question always remains, how does our government pick'em? And if they fail? Well, that was a market failure! Government will not say, we failed in picking and "greasing the skids" to the tune of tens of millions of taxpayers money, of this or that drug company, do they?
Burger King has left the U.S. for Canada. The combined federal, state and local corporate tax rate in Canada is 26.3%, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The combined U.S. corporate rate is 39.1%. Buffet, an advocate for higher corporate taxes, greased the deal to the tune of $11B. Get the feeling that we are losing the war on poverty!
As a part of the Great Society, Johnson believed in expanding the government's role in education and health care as poverty reduction strategies. These policies can also be seen as a continuation of Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal, which ran from 1933 to 1935, and the Four Freedoms of 1941.