Replies to post #16048 on Labor Smart Inc (LTNC)

[sobe4life]

As a matter of seemingly important significance....

I should have called Schadel out on the conference call. Shame on me for spending time with my family between my international work schedule instead of listening to Schadel drone on about his shallow plans.

Hmmm....

The conference call had been communicated twice over the course of three weeks and was held on a Thursday at 10:00 am (EST).

I am fairly confident that anyone with a vested interest, opinion or conviction regarding Labor SMART and its CEO would have gone out of their way to be on the call, in order to take advantage of the ability to have their voice be heard.

Even I held off on feeding my goldfish just to be on the call.

[sobe4life]

The email, the email, the damning email...

As for what Schadel told me in an email, believe it or don't. Makes no difference to me. I submitted an SEC complaint on the matter and intend to submit another one with more information.

Yes, I read about this damning email where the CEO 'allegedly" stated to a shareholder that he was not deliquent in his Payroll taxes in January 2014.

Guess what???

I DON'T BELIEVE IT!!!!

IT DOESN'T EXIST!

I knew that Labor SMART was deliquent in their payroll taxes, but I also knew they hired a specialist to go in and negotiate an Agreement for extended payments, which is EXACTLY the proper thing to do under those circumstances.

There is NO WAY the CEO would go around lying to anyone about this situation. Much less, put it in an email. PERIOD!

I would like to be proven wrong with a copy of this damning email for everyone to see or have this bull crap DROPPED!

Informative Tidbit:

The SEC doesn't launch investigations on reporting companies that are fully compliant within SEC rules and guidelines. Nor, do they launch investigations just because previous shareholders are not satisfied with the SEC rules on disclosures and think more information should be disclosed than what is obligated by a public company.