InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Scope08

08/27/14 7:32 PM

#13270 RE: PurpleCritter2001 #13269

Not sure what the passing of the third bullet point would be doing for us now or in the near future, but I'd imagine if they thought it was important enough to include in the vote they would have done a better job of communicating that importance to the people doing the voting.
icon url

prototype_101

08/27/14 9:01 PM

#13275 RE: PurpleCritter2001 #13269

PurpleCritter said "I feel certain the vote requirement guidelines are the same as they were in 2008, which was the last time this same company had a similar vote which took them from 50 million authorized to the present 100 million authorized; that particular share increase proposal passed by the way."

I did not recall this, so I pulled up the 2007 10K document and in the Balance Sheet Equity section of the 2007 vs 2006 Balance Sheet it shows,

Common stock $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 authorized
33,690,075 and 27,888,750 issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2007 and 2006


http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1325964/000094344008000121/form10ksb-rev1.txt

Purple where are you seeing 50 mil to 100 mil in 2008 as this does not seem right based on the 2007 10K doc ?