InvestorsHub Logo

cheynew

08/23/14 5:33 PM

#187318 RE: EYEBUYSTOX #187315

That does seem odd he has no PPHM disclosures.

hopefilled2014

08/23/14 5:34 PM

#187319 RE: EYEBUYSTOX #187315

Please EBS, don't burst the bubble. It's been so peaceful thinking of Kyoto as the goose that finally laid the golden egg.

vanessapu

08/23/14 5:50 PM

#187322 RE: EYEBUYSTOX #187315

How about adding to the board a well known and respected person to our board.
This could give confidence to the investment world ?

stoneroad

08/23/14 5:51 PM

#187323 RE: EYEBUYSTOX #187315

I think you are correct that Yopp would not turn on Thorpe/Brecken/PPHM. I think interests are aligned. Also, don't see RS. Maybe more authorized shares, but I don't even think that. IMO this is not the same old PPHM. I think we are about to hit the big leagues.

stockweiser

08/23/14 6:02 PM

#187328 RE: EYEBUYSTOX #187315

Can't see a proxy with an r\s tanking the stock since it's only a proxy it's the press release of one that will.

Frustrated

08/23/14 6:20 PM

#187339 RE: EYEBUYSTOX #187315

MD got issued a threat by PPHM legal if he kept probing for info so I'd say their interests are all aligned.

Seems to me if mgmt and their lawyers paid more attention to what was going on at their trials and within their company rather than what was being posted on message boards then maybe we wouldn't have had the tainted trials or we would have had a partner by now or at the very least found where Mary Boyd has been running to. This after all if true would not be the first time that a shareholder has been threaten by pphm's lawyers. All just my humble opinion.