InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Snackman

04/05/06 2:15 PM

#115985 RE: zen 88 #115984

Supply and demand of the technology?
icon url

awk

04/05/06 2:18 PM

#115988 RE: zen 88 #115984

zen: I personally suspect - I have no links or proof - that the reason for this Broadcom arrangement is somehow tied to HP. So, I expect some kind of HP arrangement to surface relatively soon...

HP has been procratinating...now they need to bite the bullet!

All in my opinion.

icon url

weets

04/05/06 2:19 PM

#115989 RE: zen 88 #115984

Zen,

Every deal is different. IMHO, by the end of 07' Wave will make north of 400 million dollars & you will be able to move the decimal point two places to the right!!! Carl.
icon url

dig space

04/05/06 2:24 PM

#115990 RE: zen 88 #115984

zen, prepayment

When one reads the sentence or two provided it doesn't make that much sense ....

how does one have an "intitial pre-payment" but with no minimum ... seems wave (due to cash realities) is giving the first load to BRCM at a deal rate to pull in some coin.

e.g. if one pre-pays 10M chips at a nickle (as opposed to a dime) then Wave gets $500k instead of a $1000k ... I would expect it to book as a def-rev/liability ... as since there is no minimum in the deal, BRCM could back-out (or so it seems).

I really think we are looking at a deal where Wave is reducing their cut for near-term cash-flow. I think it likely extends to only the first few lots (10 or 20 million).

But heck, I am making *all* of this up. It is the type of slush that, (with the warrants should they come into the money) would make it all good for Wave and reduce future dilution.


icon url

gowave1

04/05/06 3:10 PM

#116001 RE: zen 88 #115984

Perhaps Broadcom's recognition that:

Wave's technology is best for Broadcom and Broadcom's customers.

Wave's financials are in dire straits.

Therefore,

If Broadcom helps Wave's financial with a little chump change pre-payment and in turn, can offer their customers a better technology!

I saw that and I liked it...alot.

icon url

24601

04/05/06 5:27 PM

#116028 RE: zen 88 #115984

zen88: On the other hand, Wave almost certainly bargained for the up-front money. Maybe it drove the price-per-part to a nickel (from six cents), or to a dime (from 11 cents) in exchange for an immediate infusion of operating capital. All bargains have offsetting considerations. When a car can be bought for a negotiated price with either 0% financing or a $1,000 rebate, that tells me that a purchaser who opts for the financing is paying $1,000 to buy-down the interest rate. So I assume that the up-front money costs Wave something on the other end.

Best wishes,
John