InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

AZCowboy

08/14/14 6:19 PM

#403233 RE: bkshadow #403231

.... Simply, Incorrect on Your Part' ....

... I will not argue with you or anyone else regarding these serious matters, especially on an internet message board. ... simply put, your presentations have been, and are flawed on numerous levels' ... I am sure you are quite skilled as an accountant, however, regarding legal and procedural matters? ... well, lets just say, that's my ... pot o' stew' ...

... What you decide to post, ~ Mr BK, is none of my concern ... I am here for a financial reward ... period ... and my research began at the denial of Plan 6's attempt at approval ... (actually on the night before .. #8179 "The Standing Motion") ... and has moved forward on a research dual track with what the snh's actually wanted' ... Obviously, as posted .. the FDIC procedures being separate from the Bankruptcy ...

... My information is supported factually by the numerous relevant documents ... (posted)

... The people involved here' on this forum ... are in a position to make their own conclusions regarding the factual information presented ... again, .. (posted)

... I do not have to post here' ... I was requested to do so' ...

... nuff said'



icon url

BBANBOB

08/14/14 6:33 PM

#403241 RE: bkshadow #403231

So BK you say

It wasn't chartered as a bank. It cannot undertake these transactions.

WMB was a bank, and it used its subsidiaries to perform the above-referenced activities.



HOW or why then have the WMB BONDHOLDERS been allowed in our BK here of WMI