InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

turbodog

08/07/14 2:35 PM

#154440 RE: be_real #154439

They can't answer those questions. top secret lol
icon url

Acumen

08/07/14 3:04 PM

#154441 RE: be_real #154439

Be, you did so well that I'm going to award you a special prize!!! The new Chairman's personal WSGI email address! I can't do it now cause it takes several weeks to do. You see, the same guy who handled audio @ the SHM is the new MIS director back at the Cape.
icon url

indyjonesohio

08/07/14 3:12 PM

#154442 RE: be_real #154439

Hey, what is with the archaeology bashing here? :<)

Actually my sympathies are with Felicia in this case. A nameless state has anal-cranial inversion about their name being used in the purchase of "drones" or anything that can be called a drone. I expect said inversion will continue until after a certain upcoming election. JMO. The customer is always the customer so what is DAC going to do? Unfortunately, it comes on top of WSGI's historic need for a serious communication enema (JMO). So it doesn't help DAC look like good communicators. Felicia was a marketing major and can do better IMO. IMO she has a bad hand on this one for a little while at least.

And c,mon, she gets a break on "advanced optical package" IMO--no reason to be inelegant about products. When you sell digital cameras to the Army you call them "single frame/multi-frame electro-optical sensors" for pete's sake. LOL.

I do agree with Les Lunier that the question on the consultants' identities should be answered. Only three possible answers I can think of at the moment:

1. Our two consultants are "so and so & co." and "so and so & co.". We are honored to work with them. ;<)

or

2. Our consultants have asked us to withhold their identities (like a certain state I know) for reasons of their own. We will inform you as soon as we are free to do so, if ever.

or

3. We aren't telling you the identity of our consultants because you will only call their offices and malign us to them. It is hard enough to raise funding without some of you sending mean letters to people. Please stop it!

I suppose it could also be that they are on the terrorist watch list and they don't want us to know what villains they are. I didn't list that because that is just where some people's brains would go IMO! But, IMO, that is why you answer the question. JMO.

Les ought to write the Chairman of the Board! JMO.

But let's all agree NOT to bash archaeologists. I like what Agatha Christie said (something like)--

It is wonderful being married to an archaeologist--the older you get, the more interested in you he becomes.