Sorry, but Oing is merely being rhetorical with both attorneys, because this is not about the facts of the case, but rather IF there is a case. If there were no case, then Oing is in a position to rule with a summary judgement. That's Oing's only duty. If it goes to trial, it won't be Oing adjudicating the trial. ILNS is in NO position to go to trial. Pfizer on the other hand, wants to go to court, as they also want to challenge the patent that ILNS is holding. If for a moment, people believe that just because someone has a patent, and that it can't be overruled, well.. c'est la vie.
All this yikity yak about a huge judgement, and damages is a load of bullshit on high.
I have read transcript and Oing certainly gives Pfizer Attorney a much harder time than Shapiro
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
