Replies to post #78070 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[bananarama]

Once an investor loses trust in a company, any company, KBLB included, that investor has a serious decision to make.

I understand where you are coming from, but I have been here long enough to know that years ago were the dark ages, and you would have never survived back then and lasted this long.

Those days were ions ago compared to where we are today. We are so close now that success is knocking at our door, and now we are feeling frustration?

The long journey is almost over. Therefore, you must make a decision to stay or leave. I am staying the course, as I always have in making good investments. Those who are patient will make lots of money here. Those who are not or those who are skeptical have a gigantic decision to make.

Should you decide to stay, you must understand that this is a long, protracted process. If you refuse to accept that, then you already know your decision.

Good luck in finding your KBLB answer.....

[bananarama]

I hear ya, space...However, again, once an investor loses trust in a company, that person has a big decision to make.

In KBLB's case, it is a torturous decision, since knowing my luck, I would sell, and the next day a monster PR would come up sending the stock to .50.

Since I refuse to take that chance, I am waiting patiently. I must admit that it is very frustrating, to say the least, having to wait this long, but I accept it for what it is.

We seem to be moving at a snail's pace, but this has never been done before, so I expect setbacks. While I do not welcome them, when they occur, they still represent another step forward in getting things right and succeeding.

I trust Kim and Ben. I am willing to wait patiently. Those are my decisions; you have to make your own. Have a great evening, 'spacehc'.....Bob

[rayovac812]

Mean time Kim, or KBLB continues to feed us unsubstantial pr's.

So you are saying you don't know the difference and still don't see it when people explain. We try anyway.

Given your perspective, you should find it amazingly substantial that todays problem was so incredibly minor, that it had zero influence on production. Which means.... it means zip for the products Kim said will be first to market. This PR was for higher end applications, that require a higher level of quality assurance/lower variability, for the fiber. Which means it is for the products with which Warwick Mills is interested...the ones that won't be available for quite some time. If you remember, clothing and apparel are products that will be first to market. THIS is unaffected. Which means we can go ahead and increase production, and work on quality assurance for the high end products, in the meantime. I am not amazed that KBLB can multitask like that.

You've shown you don't know what you are reading, and are prone to misidentify fluff. Kim is obviously looking at a long term view for the Monster Silk pipeline.

Someone also pointed out that Big Red is in play for this same QA(quality assurance....to spell it out) So he mentioned this same problem...and YES ahead of time, for BR. This will no doubt have good implications for the variability he mentioned we were having with BR. Fluff? Only for the near-sighted or blind.

This is precisely why I have said retail shareholders can be taken advantage of by people that know what they are doing. Not all of us are ignorant. There are more reasons this ISN"T fluff, but you need to re-read with an eye to adaptation.

[dadofduck]

You want honesty, we all do but at what price???

Your great idea to release everything warts and all has a few issues with it in my eyes. As a company, we currently sell shares for cash. Your 'great' idea is for absolute honesty and for us to PR at the drop of a hat.

Your 'great idea' would likely send the stock price tumbling, not sure how 'agreeable' you would be then??

I'm smart enough to realise that this latest PR has negative implications but I'm grateful that Kim has painted it in a way that means plenty of investors will read it as positive (hence no sudden plummet). I'm smart enough to see that there's negatives but also optimistic enough to see the positive ("yeah we had issues but we've got them sorted and now we are FLYING").


Your suggestion is to announce the negative without announcing the solution in tandem. I'd rather you keep that suggestion locked away as I certainly wouldn't want Kim to take any notice of it.


On a final note, would love it if you humoured me and spent a little time digging on go the magical World Wide Web and find me some PRs from companies that have a completely truthful tone with plenty of negative and not an ounce of positive spin. There's a good reason why you'll have a hard time finding many of those.

[THEBEASTMUGABI]

Good honest post space. Kim needs some meat coming up here imo.

[bananarama]

"We as investors have the right to know what's going on and Kim as the responsibility to keep us informed."

That is total hogwash. Kim is under absolutely no obligation to tell you or us anything if he wishes. You have no rights whatsoever. Kim is not forced to tell you anything. You want to know every intricacy of what is going on with the company. That is not even realistic. You believe Kim has nothing better to do?

For that matter, if you invest in a bond fund, do you think the managers of that fund are going to tell you "exactly" what they are doing?

Get into reality. Let Kim do his job. Be patient, and wait to hear what is next in the "development" process. Or, as I said before, you have a big decision to make....