InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

flybyday

07/30/14 11:10 AM

#154266 RE: bankinonit #154265

Thanks Bank, much appreciated review of the meeting.

Did Glenn mention his meetings with Homeland Security and demonstrations of the BIB conducted? Does he think any possible sales to those entities are delayed as well? How did he address the small percentage of DRNE we ended up with when all 140 million shares owned are accounted for against our 10 million?

Thanks again
icon url

scarlet knight

07/30/14 11:11 AM

#154267 RE: bankinonit #154265

Bank.. Thanks for the synopsis.. I was one of those on the call, but the audio didn't allow me to hear everything..
icon url

thebull2

07/30/14 11:39 AM

#154270 RE: bankinonit #154265

Bank, you did a great job and I appreciate all your efforts.
icon url

rwehapi2003

07/30/14 12:23 PM

#154279 RE: bankinonit #154265

Many thanks, Bank. Glenn's reasoning behind the LTAS sale makes a certain amount of sense now. IMO.
icon url

Madmonks

07/30/14 1:18 PM

#154284 RE: bankinonit #154265

I appreciate your notes, bank. It's a sad situation. Thanks for not sugar-coating it.

It sounds to me like LTAS is a bust. All that hype about huge contracts hasn't materialized and probably never will. I think Glenn put an enormous amount of time, effort and money into this endeavour, and it didn't pay off. I agree with rwehapi2003 -- Glenn's reasoning for selling LTAS is making more and more sense. The company cut its losses and moved on. Maybe now he will be able to concentrate on company business that really matters. It doesn't excuse his poor judgment, however.

The one thing that jumped out at me from your notes was this:

I also asked what the source of the millions in legacy debt was and how they planned on ridding themselves of it. Barbara fielded this question. She said they were trying to figure out if the debt was legitimate. The history of the debt predates any current management and they are questioning its authenticity.

Huh? Are they serious? It seems to me that if they haven't figured it yet, they're never going to figure it out.

Was there any talk about working with a major university and what they hoped to accomplish by doing so?

icon url

coastiretired

07/30/14 1:35 PM

#154287 RE: bankinonit #154265

Ironic how Barb and Glenn hide behind SEC material event restrictions and other legal issues to thwart discussion of uncomfortable topics, yet they have no problem bandying about the names of Google, Facebook and Amazon as being interested in ARGUS.
icon url

ColeThornton

07/30/14 4:43 PM

#154301 RE: bankinonit #154265

The history of the debt predates any current management and they are questioning its authenticity.

This is a legal concept I am not familiar with. So am I to understand management feels you can borrow millions of dollars, change management and act like you don't owe it anymore?

Sounds like something a penny stock scam would try to do.

icon url

runandadd

07/30/14 5:15 PM

#154305 RE: bankinonit #154265

Thank you very much for the report.
Run
icon url

be_real

07/31/14 2:06 PM

#154324 RE: bankinonit #154265

bank, thank you for the notes. I hope they're not too serious about the possible "future acquisitions". Maybe they can merge with some company, but any (even a small) acquisition at this point will just create more dilution. We already have enough of that.

All JMHO

Thanks again bank.
icon url

BoeingOrIAintGoing

08/01/14 11:13 AM

#154343 RE: bankinonit #154265

Much appreciated.
icon url

sami1327

08/01/14 2:34 PM

#154346 RE: bankinonit #154265

Thanks Bank for sharing your time
icon url

Acumen

11/04/14 12:08 PM

#155094 RE: bankinonit #154265

Patiently waiting on the 3rd quarter "business plan for GTC growth as they work towards opening up the US sales channels".