InvestorsHub Logo

Steppenwolf_Speaks

07/28/14 3:55 PM

#16074 RE: StockFollower #16072

LOL - We already had that PR...and the lack of NWBO making sure that MD Anderson at least commented in any way on the results in the PR itself caused the stock to drop 40% in about 2 weeks.

Lord PLEASE do not let Linda put out an unsupported PR like that again!

ou71764

07/28/14 5:03 PM

#16085 RE: StockFollower #16072

Absolutely, I agree with that, StockFollower: evidence of Direct creating a systemic response in the patients and the stock price will go wild.

In particular, we have the patients from the original PR that had evidence of cancer cell destruction -- but AF challenged the data because under the RECIST criteria, they hadn't shrunk enough to indicate a response.

If weeks later those same patients now have tumor shrinkage that does qualify as a response under the RECIST criteria, then all criticism about not using the RECIST criteria goes away.

I had posed this question before - if a tumor is destroyed, will it eventually shrink? Reefrad answered that in post 15604, saying that eventually it would.

So if DCVax-Direct is showing great results, highlighting the success of those patients that AF said hadn't responded would be an ideal PR.