I understand your point, but you are making one of those easy and effortless assumptions. My point is that Stirling knows every single detail of this company (unlike us). If there was a high probability that PHOT will fail, I think we can agree he would not put money into it, as little as it may be.
On a more objective note, if he did this solely for the company not to shut down, is $72k all it takes to keep it afloat? Is this little amount of "relief" any indication of PHOT's health?
thoughts?