Yes and good points may pieinthesky, but does any of that justify future dilution? You ask why none of the naysayers would talk about the comparisons (even though the first person to bring it up was a naysayer), but I ask "So what?" Whether you or they spin it, it doesn't matter anymore than me wishing I hadn't put so much chili on the 35 chilidogs I ate today. It is in the past. Maybe it helped them maybe not -- that fact is IDCC doesn't really need the money anymore. Unless they weren't truthfull about their end of year cash balance. And that is the unspoken rub, isn't it? The naysayers are all the true IDCC faithful aren't they? I've seen the list of them, and they read like a who's-who of the most bullish from the RB board. They believe that IDCC will end the year with a huge cash balance as promised and don't see why IDCC needs to raise money at their expense. You and others, they Yaasayers, reas like a who's-who list of past doubters that even now do not take IDCC management at their word. Lots of money at the end of the year my arse, is what you are all saying. IDCC needs the money because they can't get it any other way than through diltution, that is what you are arguing. Well I believe what almost anyone tells me, and if Rip says IDCC is gonna be the richest mother of them all by the end of this year, I believe it and am betting my bottom burger on it.
I love IDCC man, I tell ya it has treated me so good in the past. I will never doubt IDCC ever, no matter what line they feed me I believe them. IDCC is one rich son of a bich, or at least they soon will be. Right? So how can you argue against them? Don't be such a doubting Thomas my man, the market rewards blind faith. So don't vote you consience vote your wallet. And order me some Quiznos while you are at it.