InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ullr

03/27/06 2:06 PM

#114593 RE: bbigtim #114592

bbigtim - Agreed. There are much better ways for Wave to be using $24k at this point. I'm surprised no one at Wave has the common sense to see this. I admire their technical knowledge but their idea of how to move share price is completely off the mark. Did Feeney sign off on this? I was frustrated when the paid for the Dutton 'research' and can't believe their doing it again. All just my opinion of course.
icon url

barge

03/27/06 2:35 PM

#114596 RE: bbigtim #114592

Bigtim---Sorry, but that post is pure baloney. Your most recent post is an excellent example of why you've been driving me a little crazy with your "insights", as of late.

Why would you post the following?

"I know that revenue increases are on the way, but they will not materialize until after a potential extension decision by the NASDAQ panel."

Why preclude the possibility that WAVE will achieve compliance by staying above one dollar before the deadline next month? Do you really believe that WAVE has no intention to launch some very impressive PRs to push the share price about a dollar thereby avoiding the need to apply for an extension?


icon url

waverider

03/27/06 7:58 PM

#114652 RE: bbigtim #114592

bbigtim ET AL, did you ever think that this was not done to boost SP, but was done to give a heads up without saying too much.