Replies to post #153537 on World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[insighter]

No hard feelings I hope as that rail was nothing against you personally but against how this deal was carried out and the subsequent wishy washy "justifications" for it.... To me the "$10 m" is Kool-Aid and Monopoly money... no real nutritive value to it... just a lot of high fructose corn syrup and coloring to fool people.. I don't know about the deaths in Guyana so was not comparing you that way, but only saying one should think independently and critically and not buy the mumbo-jumbo that one is fed.

As for Ren, if he would stop making snide comments towards me all the time, I would gladly uphold my end of the truce! IMO, one good dig deserves another...I have a friend that trades insults and banter with me (amazingly coincidental that also a legal professional), and no hard feelings there. We laugh it off then agree to meet the next time for food or movie. haha :)

[flybyday]

The purpose is not to engage in CEO bashing Indy it is to allow accountability where the buck stops. As shareholders that is our responsibility as well. Sometimes at the end of the day we can only gauge success through perceptions of share price valuation, market cap, dilution and potential. Unfortunately the outstanding shares and real number please in DRNE have everything to do with where that stock can head even in light of positive orders therefore from your "balance sheet" perspective have everything to do with what our 10 million shares are and will be worth.

We all know that the demise of WSGI share price started with the horrendous funding through LJC. No matter what misrepresentations they presented the signing of that contract was a disaster. I realize desperate situations cause desperate decisions to be made and sometimes lived with far too long. In this case it was obvious IMO what they were up to close into the funding and legal remedy should have been sought earlier. Still back to accountability Glenn is responsible for that funding desperate or not...