Replies to post #8474 on Supreme Cannabis Co Inc fka SPRWF

[sillylung]

Did you hear response to the tweet I sent him?

@Sillylung13 I know it. That's why I'm putting some back into it.

— 🆒 Chris Parry (@ChrisParry) June 18, 2014

He's cryptic.

Chris is a professional. I HIGHLY doubt ANY board makes or breaks what his opinion is on the whole deal with Supreme. If it does he would be acting like a child which isn't professional and would be out of a job especially when he is dealing with the public.

[Built tough]

I get it. I just hope CP would take people's comments on this board with a grain of salt. After all he is doing this article on Supreme and not it's IHub share holders. Supreme is in a great position to capitalize on a booming industry. I'm sure his article will be a positive thing for all Supreme shareholders. Looking forward to good things in the near future.

[sillylung]

The thing is the warrant holders have control. No matter how CP spins his article he he doesn't hold Supreme in the palm of his hand. Even if it went up/down a penny or two temporarily for the intraday. It would go back to this range we are in now until those warrants are exhausted. Primarily, this article will probably answer at least half the questions IR gets on a daily basis that don't get responded to. IMO

[HennHouse]

That would be beyond childish for him to even consider pulling an article just because some people on a forum question him. Why would he even give a shit?

[gimmeshelter]

As a former journalist, I can tell you that reporters get used to the "peanut gallery" voicing their opinions. This public forum is almost entirely faceless posters, with no accountability or credibility attached to their names, so this is hardly an indictment of the author's integrity or credibility. Until the accusers produce factual evidence of wrongdoing or a corroborating source willing to go on the record, what Mr. Parry's peers, publishers and editors say about his work is of far more importance than message board chatter.