Replies to post #153303 on World Surveillance Group Inc (fka WSGI)

[coastiretired]

Perhaps you can provide a link to WSGI's ARGUS patents that you were discussing here with Indy?

"Violate any of our patents?"
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=83060261

It would also go a long way in supporting Trunk's claims. . .

"Argus is patented, belonging to WSGI, don't care what others say."
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=101959533

[ColeThornton]

Ren how many times do they have to mention "Kroplin"...
when they shoot down WSGI before you get it?

“Claims 1-3, 6a, and 10 lack novelty under PCT Article 33(2) as being anticipated by Kroplin et al.”
“Claim 4 lacks an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Kroplin et al."
There are two sets of claims 6-7, which is improper. For the purposes of the written opinion, the second set of claims 6-7 are labeled as claims 6a and 7a.”
“Claim 6 lacks an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Kroplin et al.”
“Claim 7a lacks an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Kroplin et al.”
“Claim 8 lacks an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Kroplin et al.”
“Claims 9 and 11-12 lack an inventive step under PCT Article 33(3) as being obvious over Kroplin et al. Modified by Ferguson.”