That's probably a long ways away. Always a chance it gets dismissed and has to be refiled I suppose. Even though they have not committed the crime, they intend to. The argument the lawyers are trying to make, is they have not sold any EPANOVA, no bill of lading. So they have not committed any crime "Patent Infringement". They reference some cases, but don't know if it will hold water with the judge. Maybe on the conference call he will ask: "are you planning on selling EPANOVA?" Well you need to work out something with Amarin. Because I don't want to see you guys back in a few months.
Common sense does not always prevail in the court. So lets see what kind of judge we have.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
