InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

TreyVrai

03/23/06 2:42 AM

#15199 RE: florist #15197

It's tough to support the product if you are in an area where you can't subscribe to it. Despite what skunks may say.
icon url

HansenC

03/23/06 2:52 AM

#15205 RE: florist #15197

I cannot blame gay folks. It is the economy too.

I tell you what - I think we are all gay because we have a common denominator. We have sexual orientation in common first and foremost. We are sexual beings. The network is not sexy enough. I am not saying that it should be done - but no cable or satellite operator I know of airs gay erotica. QTN might have succeeded if they aired gay porn at night...I bet they would have had a ton of subscribers. I am not saying that QTN should have gone this route or should in the future...it is my thoughts.

Most people are not so into watching one network 24/7. It is a lot to ask people to subscribe to a network that is mediocre. Yes it was fresh at times, but it lacked compelling programming. Why order QTN when you can order Showtime and get Queer As Folk or The L Word?

I do not blame gays for not signing up. It is hard enough to get them to subscribe to magazines at a fraction of the cost.