InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bigstocksnbonds

06/01/14 9:15 PM

#221465 RE: obiterdictum #221464

Great exact report, thanks so much Obiterdictum!! FNMA $$$$$$$$
icon url

stockprofitter

06/01/14 9:23 PM

#221466 RE: obiterdictum #221464

Obi great stuff!! I gather Honorable Judge Sweeney wants all DOCS and FACTS exchanged and doesn't care how long it takes!!

Frankly, I'm okay with that :-) :-) :-)


icon url

Dax1

06/01/14 9:56 PM

#221467 RE: obiterdictum #221464

Please help me understand where we are. The govt has filed a protective order....claiming the plaintiffs are asking for evidence that is confidential, or protected, and govt can't submit . But now , doesn't the judge rule whether their claim is valid. Can we expect a ruling from the judge in a matter of days, or weeks, or months? On whether they have to submit these discovery requests. Do we know what has been asked for?
icon url

44centsAKAchoccake

06/01/14 10:00 PM

#221468 RE: obiterdictum #221464

I agree the meanings about the same. I paid to get the transcript, just to get the exact words.
icon url

pauljon4

06/01/14 11:42 PM

#221479 RE: obiterdictum #221464

as impossible as it may seem, this is starting to feel like shareholders are going to get the bend over and like it job. this administration has spent the last 6 years re-writing laws and parts of the constitution they don't like. i, most definitely, won't be selling, but sure as hell hope this judge sweeny has a moral bone in her being.